Chapter 4

 

PRESENTATION OF RESULTS

 

Summary of Results Used to Answer Each Research Question

 

Determining the need for an adult teacher education curriculum was imperative for developing this curriculum. The research questions were an integral part of this MARP. They included specific aspects of curriculum development which were the following: (a) conceptual framework, (b) curriculum development processes, (c) external and internal factors, (d) curriculum elements, (e) courses, (f) implementation processes, (g) type of curriculum, (h) integration of the curriculum in the education department, (i) internal and external stakeholders, (j) implementation plan, and (k) curriculum evaluation.

 

Research Question A: What should be the conceptual framework for the adult teacher education curriculum?

 

Results from the literature reviewed on curriculum development in adult education were used to develop the conceptual framework of the adult teacher education curriculum.

 

Research Question B: What are the appropriate processes for developing a curriculum in adult teacher education?

 

Results of the interviews conducted with the Chancellor, the Dean of Academic Affairs, the Director of the Education Department, and the Regional Supervisor of the Adult Education Program and results from the literature reviewed were used in determining the processes for developing the adult teacher education curriculum.

 

Research Question C: What external and internal factors should be considered in developing this curriculum?

 

Results of the interviews and the literature reviewed were used in identifying the external and internal factors that should be considered in the development of the adult teacher education curriculum.

 

Research Question D: What elements should a curriculum

for the preparation of adult education teachers include?

 

Results of the literature reviewed on curriculum development and the interviews conducted at IAU, Ponce Campus, were utilized in deciding what curriculum elements the curriculum should include.

 

Research Question E: What courses should be included?

 

Results from the Adult Teachers Education Questionnaire, the interviews, and the literature reviewed were used in determining the courses the curriculum should include.

 

Research Question F: What processes should be considered for the implementation of the adult teacher education curriculum?

 

The results of the interviews conducted with the Chancellor, the Dean of Academic Affairs, and the Director of the Education Department were used in considering what processes should be followed in the implementation of the curriculum.

 

Research Question G: What type of adult teacher education curriculum should be developed?

 

Results from the literature reviewed were used in deciding on the type of adult teacher education curriculum that should be developed.

 

Research Question H: What chances should be made within the education department to incorporate this curriculum?

            

The creation of a minor concentration in adult education was recommended in the interviews to incorporate the adult teacher education curriculum within the Education Department.

 

Research Question I: What internal and external

stakeholders should be considered in the design, development and implementation of this curriculum?

 

Results from the literature reviewed on curriculum development and the interviews conducted at IAU, Ponce Campus were used to identify the external and internal stakeholders to be considered in the design, development, and implementation of the adult teacher education curriculum.

 

Research Question J: What should be the implementation plan?

Results of the interviews with Dean of Academic Affairs and the Director of the Education Department and the literature reviewed were used in developing the implementation plan.

 

Research Question K: How should this curriculum be evaluated?

            

             The results of the literature reviewed on curriculum evaluation were used in selecting the curriculum evaluation model to be utilized in the evaluation of the adult teacher education curriculum.

                                  

Research Questions Findings

Results for Research Question A

 

A conceptual framework for the adult teacher education curriculum should be based on the principles, theories, concepts, and assumptions of adult education and the adult learner. It was found that Knowles' (1984) andragogical model provides the conceptual framework the adult teacher education curriculum requires since this model deals with adults, their needs, problems, and characteristics. Andragogy, the art and science of helping adults learn, develops in the teachers of adult students the knowledge, the competencies, and the skills necessary to teach adults. Other findings from the literature which contributed to the conceptual framework included recommendations for the integration of theory and practice in the preparation of adult educators (Rivero, 191‑6). Specific theory suggested included knowledge of sociology, psychosociology and social psychology, learning modalities, and preparation of teaching aids. The literature suggested specific competencies adult educators should develop (McNei1,1990; Herrscher,1992; Miller & Se11er,1989). These include knowledge about the adult learner, knowledge of methods and techniques, knowledge of field content, knowledge about the adult learning process, and curriculum design among others.

 

Results for Research Question B

            

             In the interviews conducted with the Chancellor, the Dean of Academic Affairs, the Director of the Education Department, and the Regional Supervisor of the Adult Education Program, in relation to the processes for the development of the adult teacher education curriculum specific recommendations were made: These were the following: (a) conduct a needs assessment survey among the adult basic education teachers to determine the need of this curriculum in the Ponce region; (b) based on the results of the needs assessment survey, write a proposal to the university for the development and eventual implementation of this curriculum following the institution's guide for the preparation of proposals; (c) involve the public Department of Education in the curriculum development process because the requisites for the certification of adult education teachers and specific courses the curriculum should include are determined by the public department of education; (d) take into consideration both external and internal factors in the development of the curriculum; the external factors include employment for the teachers in the Ponce region in adult education programs, the accrediting agency that must certify the curriculum, and the Department of public education that certifies the teachers; internal factors include the academic senate that must approve this curriculum, the professors who will teach the courses, the physical facilities, and the support from the Director of the Education Department and the Dean of Academic Affairs; and (e) identify the human and material resources available at the university such as the professors to teach the courses, the library resources such as books, journals, audio visual materials and the laboratories. The results of the review of the literature (Oliva, 1988; Ornstein & Hunkins, 1993; Pratt, 1994) were also used in determining the process to develop the adult teacher education curriculum. The process of curriculum development according to Knowles (1970) consists of seven phases. These are the following: (a) the establishment of a climate conducive to adult learning, (b) the creation of an organizational structure for participative learning, (c) the diagnosis of needs for learning, (d) the formulation of direction of learning, (e) the development of a design of activities, (f) the operation of the activities, and (g) the rediagnosis of needs for learning.

 

Results for Research Question C

 

Findings from the literature reviewed, (Beauchamp, 1983; Knowles, 1970; McNeil, 1990; Parnell, 1990) indicate that curriculum development is influenced by both external and internal factors. External factors include changes in demography, political influence, pressure from professional groups, local school boards, the influence of legislators at both the federal and state levels, the policy makers, technology, and social and economic problems. Internal factors include the administration of the institution, the faculty, the students, the academic senate, the directors of the departments, and the mission and goals of the institution.

 

            External and internal factors, influencing this particular project, were also identified in the interviews. External factors include the employment market, the state accrediting agency, and the Department of Public Education.  Internal factors include  the Academic Senate, the professors, the physical facilities, and the administration.

 

Results for Research Question D

           

The literature reviewed suggested the following elements any currilum should include (a) goals and objectives, (b) learning outcomes, (c) curriculum contents, (d) learning experiences, (e) competencies, (f) philosophy statement, and (g) evaluation of the curriculum. Herrscher (1992), McNeil (1990), Boone (1985), and Taba (1962) indicate that these elements must be present and in concert with one another.

 

Results for Research Question E

 

The questionnaire administered to the adult basic education teachers indicated that the courses to be included in the curriculum should be the following: (a) Introduction to Adult Education, (b) Psychology of the Adult Learner, (c) Evaluation of Adult Learning, (d) Methods and Techniques in Adult Education, (e) Preparation and use of materials in Adult Education, (f) History and Philosophy of Adult Education, (g) Sociocultural Foundations of Adult Education, (h) Introduction to Computers in Adult Education, and (i) Administration and Supervision of Adult Education Programs.

Findings from the interviews and from the literature reviewed were also used in deciding what courses the curriculum should include. The courses suggested were a methods course, psychology of the adult, preparation and use of materials, and adult evaluation.

 

Results for Research Question F

 

The Chancellor, the Dean of Academic Affairs, and the Director of the Education Department suggested following the Institution's process for the implementation of new academic programs and curricula. This implementation process implies that the curriculum must be approved at the Ponce Campus, at the central university offices, and by an external accrediting agency. At the Ponce Campus, it must be approved by the Director of the Education Department, the Dean of Academic Studies, the Academic Senate, and the Chief Executive officer. At the central level, it mast receive the approval of the University Council, the Vice President of Academic Affairs, and the President of the University. Externally it must be approved and certified by the Council of Higher Education before it is implemented at the academic unit where it originated (See Appendix H).

 

Results for Research Question G

 

            Based on the review of the literature conducted, it was concluded that the adult teacher education curriculum should follow the andragogical model proposed by Knowles (1970). The andragogical model aims at preparing adult education teachers with the knowledge and skills required of an adult education teacher.  Authors, such as, Darkenwald and Merriam(1982); Knowles (1970), and MacFarland (1985) recommend the implementation of andragogy in adult education

programs.

 

Results for Research Question H

                       

Results of the interviews conducted with the Director of the Education Department and with the Dean of Academic Affairs were used in determining what changes had to be made within the Education Department to incorporate the adult teacher education curriculum. In the interviews conducted with the Director of the Education Department and with the Dean of Academic Affairs, the creation of a minor concentration in adult education was suggested. This minor concentration would become a subspecialization in secondary education. It would be a subspecialization in secondary education because it is only in secondary education that students can obtain a subspecialization, according to the Institution's norms. From the nine courses the adult education teachers indicated, the formative committee selected six to be offered in the subspecialization. The six courses selected by the committee would provide the teachers the minimum requirements for certification by the public Department of Education. Since this concentration is considered a new academic program, it was also suggested following the institution's process for the implementation of new academic programs.

 

Results for Research Question I

 

The literature reviewed on curriculum development suggested that the internal and external stakeholders to be considered in curriculum development include among others the faculty, the students, the school administrators, the accrediting agencies, and the state and federal governments. They all have, as Mitroff (1983) calls it "a stake" in the process; therefore, it is important to integrate them in the design, development, and implementation of the curriculum.

 

The stakeholders considered in this project were those mentioned in the literature reviewed. These were the faculty, the students, the administration, the Academic Senate, and the accrediting agency. They were all taken into consideration because they are all somehow involved in the planning, development, implementation, and evaluation of the curriculum. Those faculty members who are prepared will be teaching the courses once the curriculum is implemented. Those students who decide to obtain the minor concentration in adult education will be taking the courses. The administration's support was solicited because it must approve the implementation of the curriculum and in addition the administration gave recommendations and suggestions for the development and implementation of the curriculum.  The curriculum must be presented to the Academic Senate for approval and implementation and to the accrediting agency for accreditation.

 

Results for Research Question J

 

                The implementation plan for the adult teacher education             curriculum was designed following the suggestions and recommendations given by the Regional Supervisor of the Adult Education Program, the Dean of Academic Affairs, and the Director of the Education Department. The implementation plan, according to

their recommendations, should include a time schedule, courses to be offered, credit hours, days and times (See Appendix I).

 

Results for Research Question K

           

            From the literature review conducted on curriculum evaluation, Pratt's (1980) tridimensional curriculum evaluation model was selected to evaluate the adult teacher education curriculum. Pratt's model evaluates the effectiveness, the efficiency; and the acceptability of a curriculum. Pratt (1980) observes that "There are two program dimensions; however, that should always be evaluated: effectiveness and acceptability. Some attention should also be paid to the criterion of efficiency" (p. 417).

 

The literature on curriculum evaluation (Rankin, 1990; Isaac and Michael, 1990; Best and Kahn, 1989) suggests steps that must be taken in order to conduct the evaluation of a program or curriculum. These steps are the following: (a) formulation of questions to be answered; (b) collection of data to answer the questions; (c) analysis and interpretation of the data collected, and (d) modification of the plan in light of the findings. The findings from the literature on curriculum evaluation mentioned above were used in developing the ATEC evaluation plan (see Appendix L).

 

Results of the Review of the Literature

 

Many sources were reviewed from the literature pertaining to the development of a teacher education curriculum in adult education and the most effective processes for implementing this curriculum. Appropriate ERIC documents, journals, and books were identified by a computer search using the descriptors "adult basic education," "curriculum development," and "adult teacher education." The literature reviewed suggested that an adult teacher education curriculum should include a conceptual framework, a rationale or justification, specific elements, content related to the curriculum, an implementation plan, models of curriculum development, and an evaluation plan.

 

Suggestions from the literature were used in formulating the rationale, the philosophy statement, the goals and objectives, the learning outcomes, the description of the courses, and in developing the implementation plan and the curriculum evaluation model. From the various curriculum models suggested in the literature on curriculum development (McNeil, 1990; Oliva, 1988), the andragogy model of Knowles was selected because it deals with adult students and teachers of adult students.

 

The literature reviewed provided insights in terms of the structure of a curriculum and these were carefully considered in the development of the adult teacher education curriculum. Curriculum experts (Heerrscher, 1992; Oliva, 1988; Pratt, 1994) indicate that all elements of a curriculum should be interrelated. The concept of curriculum alignment which refers to the relation that must exist between the competencies, the learning activities, and the curriculum content was taken into consideration in the design of the adult teacher education curriculum. Another concept that was considered in the design of the curriculum was curriculum integrity. According to Herrscher (1992) curriculum integrity refers to the extent to which programs, courses, and even curricula are valuable, effective, and‑appropriate in both content and design to attain the stated mission.

 

Results of Communication with State side Universities

  

Phone calls were made to the Chairpersons of the Education Department of the Universities of Auburn in Alabama, Toledo in Ohio, Wittenburg in Union Institute, Rutgers in New Jersey, and Maryland University. Prescott College in Arizona was also contacted. When the phone calls were made all chairpersons were not available in all cases, but the researcher was able to speak with education professors who served as spokespersons for the education department. The Director of the Adult Education Department at Auburn University in Alabama explained that the teacher adult education program is offered only at the graduate level. A professor from the education department at the University of Toledo indicated that the adult teacher education program is offered at the Masters level but not at the undergraduate level. An education professor from Wittenberg University in Ohio indicated that this university does not have an adult teacher education program. A professor from the education department at Rutgers University in New Jersey explained that the adult teacher education program is offered at the doctoral level only. An adult education professor from Prescott College indicated that the College has an undergraduate adult degree program, but it does not prepare teachers of adult students.

            

             In the conversations held with the professors it was found that the universities contacted did not meet the criteria developed for the interviews because they do not have undergraduate adult teacher education

programs. As a result, this researcher decided to develop the adult teacher education curriculum using the other procedures indicated in the project.

 

Results of Interviews

 

Interviews with the Chancellor, the Dean of Academic Affairs, the Director of the Education Department, and with the Regional Supervisor of the Adult Education Program of the Ponce region were conducted. Their recommendations and suggestions for the development of the adult teacher education curriculum were the following: (a) to conduct a needs assessment survey among the adult basic education teachers from the Ponce region to determine the need of this curriculum in the Ponce region, (b) to involve the Department of Public Education in the curriculum development process because the requisites for the certification of adult education teachers and specific courses the curriculum should include are determined by the public Department of Education, (c) to take into consideration both external and internal factors in the development of the curriculum: The external factors include employment for the teachers in the Ponce region in adult education programs, the accrediting agency that must certify the curriculum and the Department of Public Education that certifies the teachers and the internal factors include the Academic Senate that must approve this curriculum, the professors who will teach the courses, the physical facilities, and the support from the Director of the Education Department and the Dean of Academic Affairs, (d) to identify the human and material resources available at the university such as the professors to teach the courses, the library resources such as books, journals, audio visual materials and the laboratories, (e) to utilize the Institution's procedures for the implementation of the curriculum for which the Institution's manual for the presentation of new academic programs and curricula was consulted, (f) to develop a proposal for the university as one of the steps to implement the curriculum and present the proposal to the Academic Senate for the approval and implementation of the curriculum; (g) to include courses on the psychology of the adult student and methods and techniques in adult education which are two courses required by the public Department of Education, and (h) to incorporate the adult teacher education curriculum in the education department for which a subspecialization in adult education was suggested.

 

Results of Questionnaire Development

 

A draft of the Adult Teacher Education Questionnaire was developed utilizing input coming from different sources. The Dean of Academic Affairs, the Chancellor, the Director of the Education Department, and the Regional Supervisor of the Adult Education Program of the Ponce region were interviewed. Their recommendations for the development of the adult teacher education questionnaire were the following: (a) Utilize the SPSS (Statistical Program for the Social Sciences) for the analysis of the questionnaire's responses; (b) Utilize the Scantron machine to read the answers given to the responses; (c) Include courses in adult psychology and methods of teaching adult students;.(d) Formulate clear and specific questions; (e) Consult the literature in questionnaire development and administration; (f) Make use of some type of scale if necessary.

From the literature reviewed, specific suggestions were obtained which were used in developing the questionnaire. These included types of questions, wording of the questions, arrangement of responses, pilot testing, sampling, reliability and validity, types of scales, administration, and analysis of questionnaires.

The type of questionnaire developed was the restricted or closed‑form type. According to Best & Kahn (1989), this type of questionnaire is easy to fill out, takes little time, is relatively objective, and is fairly easy to tabulate.

 

Results of Questionnaire Validation

 

The outcome of the questionnaire validation process was the validated questionnaire. The formative committee made no modifications to the questionnaire and accepted it as stated. The committee pointed out that the questionnaire was clearly stated and well organized. The committee also indicated that the questionnaire was expected to accomplish the purpose for which it was developed because it followed the rules and principles for questionnaire development. The validated questionnaire was accepted as the data collection instrument.

 

Results of Pilot Study

 

The results of the pilot study were summarized in tables (see Appendix K). Findings from the pilot study showed that the majority of the respondents were female and that the largest group of respondents were in the age range between 41‑49. It was also found that the majority of the adult basic teachers surveyed were employed part time in the Adult Basic Education Program. Another finding was that the majority of the respondents have been employed from one to three years in the Adult Education Program. In relation to the academic preparation of the teachers, it was found that the majority has a Bachelor degree in Elementary or Secondary Education. Findings from the data collected, indicated that all of the respondents were interested in taking courses in adult education. To question seven, which asked about the number of credits in adult education teachers have taken, it was found that the majority of the respondents do not have any credits in adult education. To question nine, which asked about the teachers interest in a minor concentration in adult education, 100% of the respondents indicated that they would be interested in having a minor concentration in adult education. To question 13, which asked the teachers if they have taken university method courses in adult education, it was found that most of them have not. In terms of the teachers' needs for an adult teacher education curriculum‑in adult education, 95% indicated there is a need for this curriculum.

The respondents did not have any difficulty in answering this instrument for the following reasons:, (a) oral and written instructions were given, (b) the questions were read before the respondents answered them, (c) the respondents were given enough time to answer the questionnaire, and (d) the information requested was familiar to them because it was part of their jobs as adult basic education teachers. The other adult basic education teachers from the total sample did not have any difficulties in answering the questionnaire for the same reasons.

 

Results of Questionnaire Administration with Total Sample

 

The ATEQ was then administered to the other 72 basic adult education teachers in 16 towns of the Ponce region. Results were consistent with those of the pilot study.

 

Results from data collected indicated that the majority of the teachers surveyed were female. Findings from data gathered also indicated that the largest group of respondents were in the age range between 41‑49 (see Table 1).

 

 

Data collected indicated that the majority of the adult education teachers surveyed worked part time in the Adult Education Program. The data collected in terms of the type of Adult Teacher Education Program indicated that the majority of the teachers surveyed worked in the Adult Basic Education Program.(see Table 2).

Table three summarizes the findings in terms of the number of years the teachers surveyed have been employed in the Adult Basic Education Program. Results from the data collected indicated that the majority of the teachers surveyed have been employed in the Adult Basic Education Program from 1‑3 years (See Table 3).

 

 

 

Findings from data collected in terms of academic preparation indicated that the largest group of the teachers surveyed has earned a Bachelor degree in Elementary Education. Findings also indicated that a small group has a Master Degree in Education (see Table 4). Findings from data collected relative to the teachers' participation in workshops and seminars in adult education indicated that the majority of the adult basic education teachers does not participate in these activities (see Table 5).

 

 

 

 

 

 

Findings from data collected indicated that the majority of the teachers surveyed are interested in

taking university courses in adult education (see Table 6) .

 

 

Findings in terms of teachers' interest in a minor concentration in adult education indicated that the majority is interested in this minor concentration (see Table 7). Findings in relation to the frequency of teachers' attendance to professional meetings in adult education revealed that the largest group of respondents never attended these meetings (see Table 8) .                                 .

 


 

Results of data collected in terms of teachers' needs indicated that a large group of the adult basic education teachers felt that they needed some help in most areas related to the teaching of adult students. The area in which teachers felt they did not need much help was in the Evaluation of Adult Learning (see Table 9) .

 

 

 

Data collected indicated that the majority of the respondents do not belong to any professional organization in adult education. Findings from the data collected revealed that a large group of the respondents do not read professional journals in adult education (see Table 10).

 

 

Findings from the data collected revealed that the largest group of adult basic educators obtain information about adult education from the school director. Personal readings are another source of information for some teachers (see Table 11).

 

 

 

Results from data collected in terms of the teachers' perception of the necessity of an adult teacher education curriculum revealed that for the majority of the teachers surveyed this curriculum is a necessity (see Table 12). Results relative to course priority indicated that for most teachers the courses on Methods and Techniques in Adult Education, Introduction to Adult Education and Psychology of the Adult Learner were of high priority. The other courses were considered of average priority (see Table 13).

 

 

 

 

 

Results of the Development of the Adult Teacher Education Curriculum

 

The validated Adult Teacher Education Curriculum draft was the result of the validation process. The validated criteria were used by the formative committee to validate the curriculum. ‑The committee made no changes to the curriculum draft and accepted it as stated. The curriculum included the following elements: (a) the introduction which gives a brief description of the Adult Education Program from the public Department of Education and explains why IAU made adult education one of its priorities; (b) the philosophy statement establishes the mission of the teacher education program; (c) the rationale justifies the need there is for the development of the adult teacher education curriculum; (d) the goals and objectives state what the adult education program expects to accomplish; (e) the competencies indicate the kind of observable behavior expected from the students; (f) the instructional facilities refer to the classrooms, the library, and the Computerized Learning Center all of which will be utilized in teaching the courses; (g) the faculty qualifications explain the academic preparation required from the professors who will teach the courses; (h) the administrative support is a brief explanation of the role of those administrators in the implementation of the curriculum; (i) the clientele for the courses briefly explains who could take the courses, (j) the courses with descriptions section presents the courses in the curriculum with a brief description of each one; (k) the assessment techniques explains some of the most frequently used techniques to assess students' performance; (1) the course schedule presents a program with the courses to be offered, semester, days and hours, and (m) the instructional materials section includes textbooks and journals about adult education and some of the audio visual equipment at the Learning Resources Center professors teaching the courses could use. In addition, the curriculum draft included a proposed implementation plan, a detailed evaluation plan, and a proposed schedule for the implementation of the curriculum.

 

Results of the Development and Validation of the Implementation Plan

 

The IAU Ponce Campus ATEC Implementation Plan (See Appendix I), which also included the ATEC Course Schedule (See Appendix J), was the result of the development and validation of the proposed implementation plan. The formative committee made no modifications to the implementation plan and accepted it as stated. The committee recommended presenting the implementation plan to the Dean of Academic Affairs for approval. The committee also suggested offering the first course, Introduction to Andragogy (Ed.3640), as scheduled in the Implementation Plan.

 

Results of the Development and Validation of the Evaluation Plan

 

The ATEC Evaluation Plan (See Appendix L) was the result of the development and validation of the evaluation plan. The formative committee made no changes to the plan and accepted it as stated. The committee pointed out that although this evaluation plan was new to them, it could be compared to other evaluation models because it followed all the steps in the evaluation of a curriculum or academic program. A committee of three persons to evaluate the ATEC will be appointed by the Director of the Education Department. In a meeting, the Implementation Committee, composed of the Curriculum Coordinator, the Director of the Education Department, the Dean of Academic Affairs, and the Director of the Evaluation and Planning Office will give the evaluation committee a detailed description of the ATEC and of the formative and summative evaluations to be conducted by the evaluation committee.

 

Formative evaluations will be conducted at the end of each course by the evaluation committee. The committee will utilize the institutional course evaluation instrument and any other evaluation instruments the evaluation committee considers necessary. The results of the formative evaluations will be presented to the Implementation Committee.

 

The summative evaluation of the ATEC will be conducted when the students have completed all the courses in the curriculum. For this evaluation, the evaluation committee will utilize the evaluation plan based on Pratt's evaluation model. Each committee member will evaluate one of the curriculum dimensions suggested in the evaluation plan. The evaluators will utilize the data sources indicated in the evaluation plan to answer the evaluation questions developed for each dimension. After the summative evaluation process is completed, the formative and summative evaluation results will be presented to the Implementation Committee in a meeting. Based on the evaluation results, the Implementation Committee will make one of four decisions regarding the future of the ATEC (a) maintain the curriculum, (b) expand it, (c) revise it, or (d) abandon it. The evaluation plan will be utilized at the end of a "try‑out" period.

 

The suggested evaluation schedule was designed following the distribution of the curriculum courses recommended in the course schedule. The formative evaluations will be conducted on a semester basis, and the summative evaluation will be conducted after the students have completed all the courses (see Appendix M).

 

Results of the Validation of the Adult Teacher Education Curriculum

 

The outcome of the curriculum validation process was the validated Adult Teacher Education Curriculum for the preparation of adult basic education teachers (see Appendix N). This curriculum was validated by the summative committee (see Appendix O) after reviewing and discussing it. The committee made no changes or modifications to the curriculum. It was recommended to present the ATEC to the Academic Senate of IAU, Ponce Campus for its approval and implementation (see Appendix P).

 

Summary of Results

 

The major findings of this project can be summarized as follows: (a) There is a need for a curriculum to prepare adult basic education teachers in the Ponce region; (b) Knowles, (1970) andragogical model of adult learning and teaching provides the conceptual framework for the ATEC; (c) The influence of external and internal factors should be considered in the development of the ATEC; (d) The implementation of the ATEC should follow IAU's processes for implementing new academic programs and curricula; (e) A minor concentration in adult education is necessary to incorporate the ATEC within the Education Department; (f) The ATEC should integrate both theory and practice; (g) The ATEC should include the courses suggested in the literature, the interviews, and in the questionnaire; (h) Pratt's (1980) curriculum evaluation model provides the evaluation model for the ATEC; (i) External and internal factors should be considered in the development of the ATEC, and (j) Knowles' (1970) andragogical model provides the most appropriate curriculum model for the ATEC.

 

[Pág. Anterior]