REFERENCES

Adams, D. D., & Shrum, J. W. (1988, April). __The
effects of microcomputer-based laboratory exercises on the acquisition of line
graph construction and interpretation skills by high school biology students__.
Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research
in Science Teaching, Lake of the Ozarks, MO.

Adams, T. L. (1997). Addressing students’ difficulties
with the concept of function: Applying graphing calculators and a model of
conceptual change. __Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 19__, (2),
43-57.

Adda, J. (1982). Difficulties with mathematical
symbolism: Synonymy and homonymy. __Visible language, 16__, (3), 205-214.

Angel, A. R. (2000). __Intermediate algebra for College
Students__. Fifth Edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Artigue, M. (1992). Functions from an algebraic and
graphic point of view: Cognitive difficulties and teaching practices. In G.
Harel & E. Dubinsky (Eds.), __The concept of function: Aspects of
epistemology and pedagogy__: MAA Notes Vol. 25 (pp. 109-132). Washington, DC:
Mathematical Association of America.

Beckmann, C. E. (1988). Effect of computer graphics use
on student understanding of calculus concepts (Doctoral dissertation, Western
Michigan University). __Dissertation Abstracts International, 50__, 1974B.

Berg, C. A., & Phillips, D. G. (1994). An
investigation of the relationship between logical thinking structures and the
ability to construct and interpret line graphs. __Journal of Research in
Science Teaching, 31__, (4), 323-344.

Bertin, J. (1967). __Sémiologie graphique: les
diagrammes, les réseaux, les cartes__ [Graphic semiology: diagrams, networks, cards]. Paris: Mouton.

Bezuidenhout, J. (1998). First-year university students’
understanding of rate of change. __International Journal of Mathematical
Education in Science & Technology, 29__, (3), 389-399.

Borba, M. C., & Confrey, J. (1996). A student’s
construction of transformation of functions in a multiple representational
environment. __Educational Studies in Mathematics, 31__, (3), 319-397.

Bosch, W. W., & Strickland, J. (1998). Systems of
linear equations on a spreadsheet. __Mathematics & Computer Education, 32__,
(1), 11-16.

Bowen, G. M., & Roth, W. M. (1998). Lecturing
graphing: What features of lectures contribute to student difficulties in
learning to interpret graphs? __Research in Science Education, 28__, (1),
77-90.

Breidenbach, D., Dubinsky, E., Hawks, J., & Nichols,
D. (1992). Development of the process conception of function. __Educational
Studies in Mathematics, 23__, (3), 247-285.

Brenner, M. E., et al. (1995, October). __The role of
multiple representations in learning algebra__. Paper presented at the Annual
Conference of the North American Chapter of the International Study Group for
the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Columbus, OH.

Brenner, M. E., et al. (1997). Learning by understanding:
The role of multiple representations in learning algebra. __American
Educational Research Journal, 34__, (4), 663-689.

Browning, C. A. (1991). Level of graphical understanding:
Comparisons between high school and college precalculus students. In F. Demana
& B. K. Waits (Eds.), __Proceedings of the Second Annual Conference on
Technology in Collegiate Mathematics__ (pp. 129-132). Reading, MA:
Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

Bruner, J. S. (1964). The course of cognitive growth. __American
Psychologist, 19__, 1-15.

Bruner, J. S. (1966). __Toward a theory of instruction__.
New York: WW Norton & Company, Inc.

Burrill, G. F., & Hopfensperger, P. (1998). __Exploring
linear relations: Data-driven mathematics__.
Dale Seymour Publications.

Calculus Consortium at Harvard. (2001). __About the
Calculus Consortium based at Harvard University__ [On-line]. Available: http://www.wiley.com/college/cch/aboutconsortium.html.

Caldwell, F. (1997, October). __Bring functions and
graphs to the life with the CBL__. A presentation at the 1997 Carolinas
Mathematics Conference, Charlotte, NC.

Carlson, M. P. (1997). Obstacles for college algebra
students in understanding functions: What do high-performing students really
know? __Amatyc Review, 19__, (1), 48-59.

Confrey, J., et al. (1991). __The use of contextual
problems and multi-representational software to teach the concept of functions__.
Final Report Project. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.

Cooney, T. J., & Wilson, M. R. (1993). Teachers’
thinking about functions: Historical and research perspectives. In T. A.
Romberg, E. Fennema, T. P. Carpenter (Eds.), __Integrating research on the
graphical representation of functions__ (pp. 131-158). Hillsdale, NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

Crocker,
D. A. (1991). A qualitative study of interactions, concept development and
problem solving in a calculus class immersed in the computer algebra system
Mathematica^{TM} (Doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University). __Dissertation
Abstracts International, 52__, 2448A.

Cuoco,
A. A. (Ed.) (2001). __The roles of representation in school mathematics__.
Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

De Jong, T., et al. (1998). Acquiring knowledge in
science and mathematics: The use of multiple representations in technology-based
learning environments. In N. Bennett, E. DeCorte, S. Vosniadou, & H. Mandl
(Series Eds.) & M. W. Van Someren, P. Reimann, H. P. A. Boshuizen, & T.
De Jong (Vol. Eds.), __Learning with multiple representations__ (pp. 9-40).
Oxford: Pergamon.

DiBiase, J., & Eisenberg, M. (1995, June). __Mental
imagery in the teaching of functions__. Paper presented at the Annual
National Educational Computing Conference, Baltimore, MD

Dienes, Z. P. (1963). __An experimental study of
mathematics__. London: Hutchinson Educational LTD.

Dienes, Z. P. (1963). __Building up mathematics__.
London: Hutchinson Educational LTD.

Dienes, Z. P. (1964). __The power of mathematics__.
London, Hutchinson Educational LTD.

Dienes, Z. P. (1973). __The six stages in the process of
learning mathematics__. NFER Publishing Company Ltd., Windsor, Berks.

Dienes, Z. P., & Golding, E. W. (1971). __Approach
to modern mathematics__. New York: Herder & Herder.

Donnelly,
I. R. (1995). __Mathematics and
technology: A case study of the teaching of functions using multiple
representation software__. Unpublished master’s thesis, University of
Manitoba.

Douglas, R. G. (Ed.). (1986). __Toward a lean and lively
calculus: Report of the conference/workshop to develop curriculum and teaching
methods for calculus at the college level__ [MAA Notes Number 6]. Washington,
DC: Mathematical Association of America.

Dreyfus, T. (1991). Advanced mathematical thinking
process. In D. Tall (Ed.), __Advanced mathematical thinking__ (pp. 25-41).
The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Dreyfus, T., & Eisenberg, T. (1982). Intuitive
functional concepts: A baseline study on intuitions. __Journal for Research in
Mathematics Education, 13__, 360-380.

Dreyfus, T., & Eisenberg, T. (1988). __On
visualizing function transformations__. Unpublished manuscript.

Dubinsky, E., & Harel, G. (1992). The nature of the
process conception of function. In G. Harel & E. Dubinsky (Eds.), __The
concept of function: Aspects of epistemology and pedagogy__: MAA Notes Vol.
25 (pp. 85-106). Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.

Dufour- Janvier, B., Bednarz, N., & Belanger, M.
(1987). Pedagogical considerations concerning the problem of representation. In
C. Janvier (Ed.), __Problems of representation in the teaching and learning of
mathematics__ (pp. 109-122). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Publishers.

Dugdale, S. (1986). Pathfinder: A microcomputer
experience in interpreting graphs. __Journal of Educational Technology
Systems, 15__, (3), 259-280.

Dugdale, S. (1993). Functions and graphs – Perspectives
on student thinking. In T. A. Romberg, E. Fennema, & T. P. Carpenter
(Eds.), __Integrating research on the graphical representation of functions__
(pp. 101-130). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

Eisenberg, T. (1991). Functions and associated learning
difficulties. In D. Tall (Ed.), __Advanced mathematical thinking__ (pp.
140-152). The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Eisenberg, T., & Dreyfus, T. (1991). One the
reluctance to visualize in mathematics. In W. Zimmerman & S. Cunningham
(Eds.), __Visualization in teaching and learning mathematics__ (pp. 25-37).
Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.

English,
L. D., & Halford, G. S. (1995). __Mathematics education: Models and
processes__. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Mahwah, NJ.

Even, R. (1990). Subject matter knowledge for teaching
and the case of functions. __Educational Studies in Mathematics, 21__, (6),
521-544.

Ferrini-Mundy, J., & Graham, K. (1991, January). __Research
in calculus learning: Understanding of limits, derivatives, and integrals__.
Paper presented at the Joint Mathematics Meetings, Special Session on Research
in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, San Francisco, CA.

Fey, J. T. (1989). School algebra for the year 2000. In
S. Wagner & C. Kieran (Eds.), __Research issues in the learning and
teaching of algebra__. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of
Mathematics.

Fey, J. T. (1989). Technology and mathematics education:
A survey of recent developments and important problems. __Educational Studies
in Mathematics, 20__, (3), 237-272.

Friedler, Y., & Mc Farlane, A. E. (1997). Data
logging with portable computers: A study of the impact on graphing skills in
secondary pupils. __Journal of Computers in Mathematics & Science
Teaching, 16__, (4), 527-550.

Garofalo, J., & Durant, K. (1991). Applied functions
and graphs: A necessary topic for developmental mathematics. __Research &
Teaching in Developmental Education, 8__, (1), 51-55.

George, M. D., et al. (1996). __Shaping the future: New
expectations for undergraduate education in science, mathematics, engineering,
and technology__ (National Science Foundation Rep. No. 96139. Washington, DC:
National Science Foundation.

Gningue, S. M. (2000). The use of manipulatives in middle
school algebra: An application of Dienes’ variability principles. __Dissertation
Abstracts International, 60__(12), 4356A. (University Microfilms No. AAT
9956352).

Goldenberg, E. P. (1987). Believing is seeing: How
preconceptions influence the perception of graphs. In J. Bergeron, N.
Herscovits, & C. Kieran (Eds.), __Proceedings of the Eleventh
International Conference on the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 1__,
197-203.

Goldenberg, E. P. (1988). Mathematics, metaphors, and
human factors: Mathematical, technical, and pedagogical challenges in the
educational use of graphical representation of function. __Journal of
Mathematical Behavior, 7__, (2), 135-173.

Goldenberg, P., Lewis, P., & O’Keefe, J. (1992).
Dynamic representation and the development of a process understanding of
function. In G. Harel & E. Dubinsky (Eds.), __The concept of function:
Aspects of epistemology and pedagogy__: MAA Notes Vol. 25 (pp. 235-260).
Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.

Goldin, G. A. (1990). Epistemology, constructivism, and
discovery learning in mathematics. In R. B. Davis, C. A. Maher, & N.
Noddings (Eds.), __Constructivist views on the teaching and learning
mathematics__ (pp. 31-47). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of
Mathematics.

Goldin, G., & Shteingold, N. (2001). Systems of representations and the development
of mathematical concepts. In A. Cuoco (Ed.), __The roles of representation in
school mathematics__ (pp. 1-23). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of
Mathematics.

Greeno, J. G., & Hall, R. P. (1997). Practicing
representation: Learning with and about representational forms. __Phi Delta
Kappan, 78__, (5), 361-367.

Hart, D. K. (1991). Building concept images:
Supercalculators and students’ use of multiple representations in calculus. __Dissertation
Abstracts International, 52__(12), 4254A. (University Microfilms No. AAI
9214776).

Hiebert, J., & Carpenter, T. P. (1992). Learning and
teaching with understanding. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), __Handbook of research on
mathematics teaching and learning__ (pp. 65-97). New York: Macmillan.

Hughes-Hallet, D. (1991). Where is the mathematics?
Another look at calculus reform. In F. D. Demana, B. K. Waits, & J. Harvey
(Eds.), __Proceedings of the second annual conference on technology in
collegiate mathematics__ (pp. 31-33). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Iannone, M. A. (1975). A study of two approaches to the
learning of the function concept: The tabular approach and the mapping diagram
approach. __Dissertation Abstracts International, 36__(07), 4383A.

International Association for the Evaluation of
Educational Achievement. (1995). __Second Study of Mathematics__. Technical
Report IV, Instrument Book.

Janvier, C. (1987a). Representation and understanding:
The notion of function as an example. In C. Janvier (Ed.), __Problems of
representation in the teaching and learning of mathematics__ (pp. 67-71).
Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

Janvier, C. (1987b). Conceptions and representations: The
circle as an example. In C. Janvier (Ed.), __Problems of representation in the
teaching and learning of mathematics__ (pp. 147-158). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence
Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

Janvier, C., Girardon, C., & Morand, J. C. (1993).
Mathematics symbols and representations. In P. S. Wilson (Ed.), __Research
ideas for the classroom: High school mathematics__ (pp. 79-102). New York:
Macmillan Publishing Company.

Johari, A. (1998). __Effects of inductive multimedia
programs including graphs on creation of linear function and variable
conceptualization__. Tucson, AZ: Arizona State University.

Kaput, J. J. (1985). Representation and problem solving:
Methodological issues related to modeling. In E. A. Silver (Ed.), __Teaching
and learning mathematical problem solving: Multiple research perspectives__
(pp. 381-398). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Kaput, J. J. (1987). Representation systems and
mathematics. In C. Janvier (Ed.), __Problems of representation in the teaching
and learning of mathematics__ (pp. 19-26). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates Publishers.

Kaput, J. J. (1989a). Linking representations in the
symbol systems of algebra. In S. Wagner & C. Kieran (Eds.), __Research
issues in the learning and teaching of algebra__ (pp. 167-194). Hillsdale,
NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

Kaput, J. J. (1989b). Information technologies and affect
in mathematical experiences. In D. B. McLeod, & V. M. Adams (Eds.), __Affect
and mathematical problem solving__ (pp. 89-103). New York: Springer-Verlag.

Kaput, J. J. (1991). Notations and representations as
mediators of constructive processes. In E. Von Glasersfeld (Ed.), __Radical
constructivism in mathematics education__ (pp. 53-74). The Netherlands:
Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Kaput, J. J. (1992). Technology and mathematics
education. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), __Handbook of research on mathematics
teaching and learning__ (pp. 515-556). New York: Macmillan.

Keller, B. A., & Hirsch, C. R. (1998). Student
preferences for representations of functions. __International Journal of
Mathematical Education in Science & Technology, 29__, (1), 1-17.

Kieran, C. (1993). Functions, graphing, and technology:
Integrating research on learning and instruction. In T. A. Romberg, E. Fennema,
& T. P. Carpenter (Eds.), __Integrating research on the graphical
representation of functions__ (pp. 189-237). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates Publishers.

LaLomia, M. J., Coovert, M. D., & Salas, E. (1988). __Problem
solving performance and display preference or information displays depicting
numerical functions__. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 308862).

Lauten, A. D., et al. (1994). Student understanding of
basic calculus concepts: Interaction with the graphics calculator. __Journal
of Mathematical Behavior, 13__, (2), 225-237.

Lay, L. C. (1982). Mental images and arithmetical
symbols. __Visible Language, 16__, (3), 259-274.

Leinhardt, G., et al. (1990). Functions, graphs, and
graphing: Tasks, learning, and teaching. __Review of Educational Research, 60__,
(1), 1-64.

Lesgold, A. (1988). Multiple representations and their
implications for learning. In N. Bennett, E. DeCorte, S. Vosniadou, & H.
Mandl (Series Eds.) & M. W. Van Someren, P. Reimann, H. P. A. Boshuizen,
& T. De Jong (Vol. Eds.), __Learning with multiple representations__
(pp. 307-319). Oxford: Pergamon.

Lesh, R. (1987). The evolution of problem representations
in the presence of powerful conceptual amplifiers. In C. Janvier (Ed.), __Problems
of representation in the teaching and learning of mathematics__ (pp.
197-206). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

Lesh, R., Post, T., & Behr, M. (1987). Representation
and translations among representation in mathematics learning and problem
solving. In C. Janvier (Ed.), __Problems of representation in the teaching and
learning of mathematics__ (pp. 33-40). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates Publishers.

Lloyd, G. M. (1996). __Change in teaching about
functions: Content conceptions and curriculum reform__. Virginia Polytechnic
Institute and State University.

Lloyd, G. M., & Wilson, M. (1998). Supporting
innovation: The impact of a teacher’s conceptions of functions on his
implementation of a reform curriculum. __Journal for Research in Mathematics
Education, 29__, (3), 248-274.

Lloyd, G., & Wilson, M. R. (1995, October). __The
role of teacher’s mathematical conceptions in his implementation of a
reform-oriented functions unit__. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of
the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of
Mathematics Education, Columbus, OH.

Lovell, K. (1971). Some aspects of the growth of the
concept of a function. In M. F. Rosskopf, & L. P. Steffe (Eds.), __Piagetian
cognitive-development research and mathematical education__ (pp. 12-33).
Washington, DC: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Malik, M. A. (1980). Historical and pedagogical aspects
of the definition of function. __International Journal of Mathematics
Education in Science and Technology, 11__, (4), 489-492.

Markovits, Z., Eylon, B., & Bruckheimer, M. (1986).
Functions today and yesterday. __For the Learning of Mathematics, 6__, (2)
18-24.

Martínez-Cruz, A. M. (1995, October). __Graph, equation
and unique correspondence: Three models of students’ thinking about functions
in a technology-enhanced precalculus class__. Paper presented at the Annual
Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the
Psychology of Mathematics Education, Columbus, OH.

Mason, J. (1980). When is a symbol symbolic? __For the
learning of mathematics, 1__, (2), 8-12.

Mason, J. H. (1987a). What do symbols represent? In C.
Janvier (Ed.), __Problems of representation in the teaching and learning of
mathematics__ (pp. 73-81). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Publishers.

Mason, J. H. (1987b). Representing representing: Notes
following the conference. In C. Janvier (Ed.), __Problems of representation in
the teaching and learning of mathematics__ (pp. 207-214). Hillsdale, NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

McArthur, D., Burdorf, C., Ormseth, T., Robyn, A., &
Stasz, C. (1988). __Multiple representations of mathematical reasoning__. A
RAND Note: National Science Foundation.

McCoy, L. P., Baker, T. H., & Little, L. S. (1996).
Using multiple representations to communicate: An algebra challenge. In P. C.
Elliott (Ed.), __Communication in mathematics, K-12 and beyond__ (pp.
40-44). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

McFarlane, A. E., Friedler, Y., Warwick, P., &
Chaplain, R. (1995). Developing an understanding of the meaning of line graphs
in primary science investigations, using portable computers and data logging
software. __Journal of Computer in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 14__,
(4), 461-480.

McKenzie, D. L., & Padilla, M. J. (1986). The
construction and validation of the Test of Graphing Skills in Science. __Journal
of Research in Science Technology, 23__, (7), 571-580.

Megginson, R. (1995). __Harvard-Calculus Overview__
[On-line]. Available: http://archives.math.utk.edu/projnext/advice/harvardCalculus.html.

Mevarech, Z. R. & Kramarsky, B. (1997). From verbal
description to graphic representations: Stability and change in students’
alternative conceptions. __Educational Studies in Mathematics, 32__, (3),
229-263.

Monk, G. (1989, March). __A framework for describing
student understanding of functions__. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting
of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA.

Monk, G. S. (1994). Students’ understanding of functions
in calculus courses. __Humanistic Mathematics Network Journal, 9__, 21-27.

Moschkovich, J. N. (1998). Resources for refining
mathematical conceptions: Case studies in learning about linear functions. __Journal
of the Learning Sciences, 7__, (2), 209-237.

Moschkovich, J., Schoenfeld, A. H., & Arcavi, A.
(1993). Aspects of understanding: On multiple perspectives and representations
of linear relations and connections among them. In T. A. Romberg, E. Fennema,
&. T. P. Carpenter (Eds.), __Integrating research on the graphical
representation of functions__ (pp. 69-100). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates Publishers.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). __Principles
and standards for school mathematics__. Reston, VA: Author.

Noddings, N. (1990). Constructivism in mathematics
education. In R. B. Davis, C. A. Maher, & N. Noddings (Eds.), __Constructivist
views on the teaching and learning of mathematics__ (pp. 7-18). Reston, VA:
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Norman, A. (1992). Teachers’ mathematical knowledge of
the concept of function. In G. Harel & E. Dubinsky (Eds.), __The concept
of function: Aspects of epistemology and pedagogy__: MAA Notes Vol. 25 (pp.
215-232). Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.

Norman, F. A. (1993). Integrating research on teachers’
knowledge of functions and their graphs. In T. A. Romberg, E. Fennema, & T.
P. Carpenter (Eds.), __Integrating research on the graphical representation of
functions__ (pp. 159-187). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Publishers.

O’Callaghan, B. R. (1998). Computer-intensive algebra and
students’ conceptual knowledge of functions. __Journal for Research in
Mathematics Education, 29__, (1), 21-40.

Olsen, J. R. (1995, October). __The effect of the use of
number lines representations on student understanding of basic function
concepts__. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the North American
Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education,
Columbus, OH.

Orton, A. (1983a). Students’ understanding of
integration. __Educational Studies in Mathematics, 14__, (1), 1-18.

Orton, A. (1983b). Students’ understanding of
differentiation. __Educational Studies in Mathematics, 14__, (3), 235-250.

Özgün-Koca, S. A. (1998, October-November). __Students’
use of representations in mathematics education__. Poster presentation at the
Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the
Psychology of Mathematics Education, Raleigh, NC.

Padilla, M. J., et al. (1986). An examination of the line
graphing ability of students in grades seven through twelve. __School Science
and Mathematics, 86__, (1), 20-26.

Phillip, R. A., Martin, W. O., & Richgels, G. W.
(1993). Curricular implications of graphical representations of functions. In
T. A. Romberg, E. Fennema, & T. P. Carpenter (Eds.), __Integrating
research on the graphical representation of functions__ (pp. 239-278).
Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

Peirce, C. S. (1955). Logic as semiotic: The theory of
signs. In J. Buchler (Ed.), __Philosophical writings of Peirce (1893-1910)__
(pp. 98-119). New York: Dover.

Piez, C. M., & Voxman, M. H. (1997). Multiple
Representations: Using Different Perspectives to Form a Clearer Picture. __Mathematics
Teacher, 90__, (2), 164-166.

Pirie, S. E. B., & Martin, L. (1997). The equation,
the whole equation, and nothing but the equation! One approach to the teaching
of linear equations. __Educational Studies in Mathematics, 34__, (2),
159-181.

Poppe, P. E. (1993). Representations of function and the
roles of the variable. __Dissertation Abstracts International, 54__(12),
4383A. (University Microfilms No. AAI 9409911).

Porzio, D. T. (1994). The effects of differing technological
approaches to calculus on students’ use and understanding of multiple
representations when solving problems. __Dissertation Abstracts International,
55__(10), 3128A. (University Microfilms No. AAI 9505274).

Rodríguez- Ahumada, J. G., et al. (1997). __Razonamiento
matemático, fundamentos y aplicaciones__ [Mathematics reasoning, fundaments
and applications]. Mexico: International Thompson Editors.

Romberg, T. A., Carpenter, T. P., & Fennema, E.
(1993). Toward a common research perspective. In T. A Romberg, E. Fennema,
& T. P. Carpenter (Eds.), __Integrating research on the graphical
representation of functions__ (pp. 1-9). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates Publishers.

Resnick, L. B., & Ford, W. W. (1981). __The
psychology of mathematics for instruction__.
Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

Schoenfeld, A. H. (1988). Uses of computers in
mathematics instruction. In D. A. Smith, G. J. Porter, L. C. Leinbach, & R.
H. Wenger (Eds.), __Computers and mathematics: The use of computers in
undergraduate instruction__ (pp. 1-11). Washington, DC: The Mathematical
Association of America.

Schultz, J. E., & Waters, M. S. (2000). Why
representations? __Mathematics Teacher, 93__, (6), 448-453.

Schwarz, B., Dreyfus, T., Bruckheimer, M. (1990). A model
of the function concept in a three-fold representation. __Computers and
education, 14__, 249-262.

Schwingendorf, K., Hawks, J., & Beineke, J. (1992).
Horizontal and vertical growth of the students’ conception of function. In G.
Harel & E. Dubinsky (Eds.), __The concept of function: Aspects of
epistemology and pedagogy__: MAA Notes Vol. 25 (pp. 133-149). Washington, DC:
Mathematical Association of America.

Selden, A., & Selden, J. (1992). Research
perspectives on conception of function summary and overview. In G. Harel &
E. Dubinsky (Eds.), __The concept of function: aspects of epistemology and
pedagogy__: MAA Notes Vol. 25 (pp. 1-21). Washington, DC: Mathematical
Association of America.

Sfard, A. (1987). Two conceptions of mathematical
notions: Operational and structural. __Proceedings of the Eleventh
International Conference for Psychology of Mathematics Education__ (pp.
162-169). Montreal, Canada.

Sfard, A. (1991). On the dual nature of mathematical
conceptions: Reflections on processes and objects as different sides of the
same coin. __Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22__, (1), 1-36.

Sfard, A. (1992). Operational origins of mathematical
objects and the quandary of reification: The case of function. In E. Dubinsky
& G. Harel (Eds.), __The concept of function: Aspects of epistemology and
pedagogy__ (pp. 59-84). Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.

Shama, G., & Dreyfus, T. (1994). Visual, algebraic
and mixed strategies in visually presented linear programming problems. __Educational
Studies in Mathematics, 26__, (1), 45-70.

Shumway,
R. J. (1988). Symbolic computer systems and the calculus. __Amatyc Review, 11__
(1, Part 2), 56-60.

Sierpinska, A. (1992). On understanding the notion of
function. In G. Harel & E. Dubinsky (Eds.), __The concept of function:
Aspects of epistemology and pedagogy__ MAA Notes Vol. 25 (pp. 25-84).
Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.

Skemp, R. R. (1982). Communicating mathematics: Surface
structures and deep structures. __Visible language, 16__, (3), 281-288.

Skemp, R. R. (1987). __The psychology of learning
mathematics__ (Expanded American Edition). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates Publishers.

Slavit, D. (1997). An alternate route to the reification
of function. __Educational Studies in Mathematics, 33__, (3), 259-282.

Small, D., et al. (1986). Computer algebra systems in
undergraduate instruction. __College Mathematics Journal, 17__, (5),
423-433.

Steen, L. A. (Ed.). (1987). __Calculus for a new
century: A pump, not a filter__ [MAA Notes No. 9]. Washington, DC: Mathematical
Association of America.

Tabachneck-Schiff, H. J. M., & Simon, H. S. (1996).
Alternative representations of instructional material. In D. Peterson (Ed.), __Forms
of representation__ (pp. 28-46). Great Britain: Intellects Books.

Tall, D. (1985). Understanding the calculus. __Mathematics
Teaching, 110__, 48-53.

Tall, D., & Vinner, S. (1981). Concept image and
concept definition in mathematics with particular reference to limits and
continuity. __Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12__, 151-169.

Thomas, H. L. (1975). The concept of function. In M. F.
Rosskopf (Ed.), __Children’s mathematical concepts: Six Piagetian studies in
mathematics education__ (145-172). NY: Teachers’ College Press.

Thompson, P. W. (1994). Students, functions, and the
undergraduate curriculum. In E. Dubinsky, A. H. Schoenfeld, & J. Kaput
(Eds.), Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences Issues in Mathematics
Education: Vol. 4. __Research in collegiate mathematics education, I__ (pp.
21-44). Washington, DC: American Mathematical Society.

Thorpe, J. A. (1989). Algebra: what should we teach and
how should we teach it? In S. Wagner, & C. Kieran (Eds.), __Research
issues in the learning and teaching of algebra__ (pp. 11-23). Reston, VA:
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.

Tucker, T. W. (1987). Calculus tomorrow. In L. A Steen
(Ed.), __Calculus for a new century: A pump not a filter__ (pp. 14-17).
Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.

Tucker, T. W. (Ed.). (1990). __Priming the calculus
pump: Innovations and resources__ [MAA Notes 17]. Washington, DC:
Mathematical Association of America.

Turner, K. V., & Wheatley, G. H. (1980). __Mathematics
learning styles of calculus students__. Unpublished manuscript, Anderson
College.

Van Someren, M. W., et al. (1998). Introduction. In N.
Bennett, E. DeCorte, S. Vosniadou, & H. Mandl (Series Eds.) & M. W. Van
Someren, P. Reimann, H. P. A. Boshuizen, & T. De Jong (Vol. Eds.), __Learning
with multiple representations__ (pp. 1-5). Oxford: Pergamon.

Vinner, S. (1983). Concept definition, concept image and
the notion of function. __International Journal of Mathematics Education in
Science and Technology, 14__, (3), 293-305.

Vinner, S. (1989). The avoidance of visual considerations
in calculus students. __Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 11__,
(2), 149-156.

Vinner, S. (1992). The function concept as a prototype
for problems in mathematics learning. In G. Harel & E. Dubinsky (Eds.), __The
concept of function: Aspects of epistemology and pedagogy__: MAA Notes Vol.
25 (pp. 195-213). Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.

Vinner, S., & Dreyfus, T. (1989). Images and
definitions for the concept of function. __Journal for Research in Mathematics
Education, 20__, (4), 356-366.

Von Glasersfeld, E. (1987). Preliminaries to any theory
of representation. In C. Janvier (Ed.), __Problems of representation in the
teaching and learning of mathematics__ (pp. 215-225). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence
Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

Von Glasersfeld, E. (1990). An exposition of
constructivism: Why some like it radical. In R. B. Davis, C. A. Maher, & N.
Noddings (Eds.), __Constructivist views on the teaching and learning of
mathematics__ (pp. 19-29). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of
Mathematics.

Von Glasersfeld, E. (1996). Aspects of radical
constructivism and its educational recommendations. In L. Steffe, et al.
(Eds.), __Theories of mathematical learning__ (pp. 307-314). Hillsdale, NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

Wenger, R. H. (1987). Cognitive science and algebra
learning. In A. H. Schoenfeld (Ed.), __Cognitive science and mathematics
education__ (pp. 217-251). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
Publishers.

Williams, C. G. (1998). Using concept maps to assess
conceptual knowledge of function. __Journal for Research in Mathematics
Education, 29__, (4), 414-421.

Yerushalmy, M. (1991). Student perceptions of aspects of
algebraic functions using multiple representation software. __Journal of
Computer Assisted Learning, 7__, (1), 42-57.

Yerushalmy, M. (1997). Designing representations:
Reasoning about functions of two variables. __Journal for Research in
Mathematics Education, 28__, (4), 431-466.